Save Freeview HD

Search

Categories

Home General BBC Ofcom HD For All CONTACT US Government

Latest Issue

The Magazine

News Feeds

All What is RSS?

Links

20071017 Wednesday October 17, 2007

Would you sacrifice a Freeview mux for hi-def?

Ofcom will propose converting an entire Freeview multiplex to DVB-T2 so that up to four free hi-def channels can launch within this decade.

Ed Richards, chief executive of the UK's media regulator, said Ofcom will publish its proposal for re-arranging the Freeview multiplexes during November.

He said Ofcom is in favour of encouraging free high definition TV and is still considering the best use of the analogue spectrum after Digital Switch, but had not been convinced it should be given freely to public broadcasters for hi-def.

Instead, one of the three public service multiplexes would have to be converted to DVB-T2 and MPEG-4, possibly as early as 2009. Presumably, the other Freeview muxes would have to be re-organised to make sure no-one missed out on existing MPEG-2 channels.

Mr Richards told the Westminster Media Forum: "Let me be clear that Ofcom believes that HD offers an exciting improved experience for viewers. We are far from indifferent to HD, but we remain firmly platform neutral and pro-competition in our approach.

"We also remain open to argument and evidence for a non market allocation where there is an identifiable public interest that clearly outweighs the opportunity cost associated with it.

"We are working with the broadcasters and others to ensure that the spectrum they already have is used in as efficient a manner as possible. And here we have a great opportunity.

"For some time now Ofcom has been developing a proposal which would enable us to clear an entire multiplex and convert this to an improved compression and transmission standard. If we can make this proposal work, then there is a very major prize.

"Success would mean not only the doubling of capacity for one universally available multiplex, but also for the first time, a migration path for the entire Freeview platform which would offer an enormous increase in capacity.

"This proposal holds out the prospect of HD services on Freeview, using existing capacity, as early as late 2009 and at far lower cost than any alternative proposal."

Of course, that last statement might not be entirely true - it would minimise the cost to the Treasury because they wouldn't lose any funds from the sale of former analogue spectrum

It would also minimise the cost of setting up transmitters for a new Freeview multiplex - which could be significant.

But it seems unlikely that the current roster of Freeview channels could be maintained, without reducing their broadcast quality or axing 'inefficient' uses, such as +1 channels.

Watching anything on the DVB-T2 multiplex would also require a new set-top box, but that shouldn't come as much of a surprise to readers of Save Freeview HD.


Advertisement
Trackback URL:
Comments:

Maybe strip Sky of their slots, as they were only going to try and create another pay tv service on "FREE"View. Sky hate competition as we saw in the Virgin Media battle, and I would hate for Sky to try and ruin freeview by turning valuable slots into pay slots.

Posted by Lee Branch (127.0.0.1) on October 17, 2007 at 04:27 PM BST #

Hopefully! they will get the standard sorted and wait till kit is availible before switching off 2K so some of us don't have to fork out for two lots of kit.

Posted by colin (127.0.0.1) on October 17, 2007 at 09:41 PM BST #

Yes this sounds like a good idea as long as the channels on the a whole mux they dump are the shopping ones!

Posted by James (127.0.0.1) on October 18, 2007 at 07:38 AM BST #

Why should we have to pay sky to watch hdtv! Come on ofcom serve the public properly and give us what we all want hd freeview as we are all ready licence payers!

Posted by alan kirby (127.0.0.1) on October 18, 2007 at 10:20 AM BST #

Get rid of the top up tv rubbish absolute waste of space and kick up the sky subscription planned package. Plenty of room on the satellite for pay packages, Keep Freeview Free

Posted by Robert (127.0.0.1) on October 22, 2007 at 11:25 PM BST #

I agree that the +1 channels appear to be the best means of improving capacity for HD introduction,but it is a worry that Ofcom seem to be more concerned with making money for the Gov't than serving public interest. They should remember that Sky can simply increase their charges when they need more money, something I'm sure that the BBC would love to be able to do.

Posted by James Thomas (127.0.0.1) on October 29, 2007 at 08:59 PM GMT #

HD is important.
Get rid of pay, +1 and shopping, as there is not the space. Only TV should be on this spectrum. Mobile TV should use other frequencies.

Posted by Ian (127.0.0.1) on November 21, 2007 at 10:15 AM GMT #

Sky and other commercial interests,especially cable companies, has held back the UK in technology for far to long, will OFCOM please wake up to the fact that the British people have been denied the advances that were in the pipeline at the beginning of the 90s, digital satellite TV, small Squarials, not 60cm dishes, old analogue from Sky on low power Astra, and the delay with Fiber optic cable that BT had planned and would have installed by 2000, broadband that would be faster and ahead of the world instead of one of the most expensive in Europe. OFCOM do not deny the British Public again a loss of the chance to lead the world. Allow at least four HD channels on Freeview ignore the other money grabbers who take enough out of the gullible Publics pockets

Posted by David \Fry (127.0.0.1) on January 18, 2008 at 08:15 PM GMT #

Post a Comment:

Name:
E-Mail:
URL:

Your Comment:

HTML Syntax: NOT allowed

Calendar

« October 2007 »
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
   
       
Today